Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:27 pm
by jiang295
if i use uv and ms in series, tubing between uv and ms is 1m long with od at 0.005'', then i got twice of peak width at ms than in uv.
is it only tubing problem?
You can try this all out by yourself, and confirm or dismiss my proposition that the tubing is the possible source of the problem. Disconnect the column and inject the same sample under the same mobile phase conditions and flow rate with the same setup, just without the column.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:54 pm
by jiang295
if i use uv and ms in series, tubing between uv and ms is 1m long with od at 0.005'', then i got twice of peak width at ms than in uv.
is it only tubing problem?
You can try this all out by yourself, and confirm or dismiss my proposition that the tubing is the possible source of the problem. Disconnect the column and inject the same sample under the same mobile phase conditions and flow rate with the same setup, just without the column.
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:01 pm
by Uwe Neue
I thought you had them in parallel rather than in series... ???
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:04 am
by jiang295
i did another test.
I thought you had them in parallel rather than in series... ???
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:48 pm
by jiang295
you are absolutely right about this.
Well, that assumption would depend on the analyte and the MS instrument conditions. If you are talking about your own method, it is possible that the mass spec is just simply more sensitive than the UV and that's why the analyte tailing becomes apparent.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 5:31 pm
by Uwe Neue
Hmmh...
I don't know about that... At equal injection (which is what we are talking about here), the peak should look the same. Unless your noise in the UV is horrendous, and you have a very slow signal-to-noise ratio, I can't see this as a valid explanation.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:56 pm
by jiang295
it is really just senstivity issue.
the fact that ms is far more senstive than uv make peak in ms much wider than those in uv.
I injected very small amount of sample, peak width become very similar to both detectors.
Hmmh...
I don't know about that... At equal injection (which is what we are talking about here), the peak should look the same. Unless your noise in the UV is horrendous, and you have a very slow signal-to-noise ratio, I can't see this as a valid explanation.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 1:11 am
by Uwe Neue
That makes no sense... On a one to one scale, comparing peaks of the same height, they must look the same.
I think we are getting closer to the true explanation...
If your MS peak looks wider at the bottom at equal height at a high sample concentration, and if both peaks look more similar at equal height at low concentration, your MS signal is strongly non-linear at the higher concentration, i.e. with a downward curvature of the response. Did you look at the linearity of the MS response?