-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:26 pm
Advertisement
Method Validation using 2002/657/EC (CCa; determination)
Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.
4 posts
Page 1 of 1
We are currently working on in-house method validation of chloramphenicol in milk using LCMSMS. We are carrying out validation as per 2002/657/EC. Can some one assist me in estimating CCa (decision limit) ??
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:48 pm
You can find lots of interesting publications in this topic, just use pubmed.gov and search for "chloramphenicol 2002/657/EC". If you want use some "validated" software for it, you can buy cheap (about 100 Euro) ResVal - excel-based software from Community Reference Laboratory in Netherlands:
http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaal ... n2006a.pdf
http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaal ... n2006a.pdf
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 12:26 pm
dr_pyrex, thanks for the information. I am using the calibration curve procedure and I am a little confused as to how one calculates the standard deviation of the within-laboratory reproducibility of the intercept. I have figured out he rest except this. I will also find out about the excel program in the meantime, thanks
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:18 pm
Our lab has been grappling with 2002/657 for some years now and I can tell you it is not easy. We have several methods accredited under ISO 1725 and I can assure you my auditors are as uncertain as me as how to calculate a meaningful CCalpha.
We also use the calibration curve but only to get an idea of the actual value of CCalpha. Then, we check this theorical value in terms of unequivocal identification: if this CCalpha is true about half of the samples spiked at this concentration should be "compliant" (e.g. "not detected") because their ion ratios are outside the range allowed in the Decision, which implies there are not enough identification points to identify the analyte. If that is not the case we try higher or lower concentrations until we get around 50% compliant samples.
Hope it helps. Good luck
We also use the calibration curve but only to get an idea of the actual value of CCalpha. Then, we check this theorical value in terms of unequivocal identification: if this CCalpha is true about half of the samples spiked at this concentration should be "compliant" (e.g. "not detected") because their ion ratios are outside the range allowed in the Decision, which implies there are not enough identification points to identify the analyte. If that is not the case we try higher or lower concentrations until we get around 50% compliant samples.
Hope it helps. Good luck
Mike
4 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 63 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 63 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 11462 on Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:32 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests
Most users ever online was 11462 on Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:32 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
